Efficiency of Optimization Algorithms in Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords:
optimization algorithms, artificial intelligence, gradient-based methods, gradient-free methods, deep learning, particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithmsAbstract
This article explores the effectiveness and efficiency of optimization algorithms in artificial intelligence (AI), focusing on the comparison between gradient-based and gradient-free methods. It investigates how these algorithms contribute to the optimization process in various AI applications, including deep learning, reinforcement learning, and real-world case studies such as autonomous vehicle navigation and medical image diagnosis. Through comprehensive experimentation and analysis, the study provides insights into the strengths, weaknesses, and trade-offs of different optimization techniques, including Adam, SGD, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Genetic Algorithms. The article also discusses the potential of hybrid optimization approaches that combine both gradient-based and heuristic methods to enhance convergence speed, computational efficiency, and model performance. The findings demonstrate the significant role of optimization in improving AI model performance, scalability, and adaptability across diverse applications, ultimately contributing to the advancement of AI technologies.
References
[1]. S. Ruder, “An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1609.04747, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04747
[2]. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” Int. Conf. on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2014. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980
[3]. J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks (ICNN'95), pp. 1942–1948, 1995. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968
[4]. J. H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, 1975.
[5]. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
[6]. X. Zhang and K. He, “A survey on deep learning optimization algorithms,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–38, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume20/19-046/19-046.pdf
[7]. X. S. Yang, Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms, Elsevier, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-18875-0
[8]. G. Brockman et al., “OpenAI Gym,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1606.01540, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.01540
[9]. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning, MIT Press, 2016.
[10]. Y. Nesterov, “A method for solving the convex programming problem with convergence rate O(1/k^2),” Sov. Math. Dokl., vol. 27, pp. 372–376, 1983.
[11]. R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd ed., MIT Press, 2018.
[12]. Y. Bengio, “Learning deep architectures for AI,” Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–127, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000006
[13]. M. Abadi et al., “TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1603.04467, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04467
[14]. A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762
[15]. T. Chen et al., “Training deep nets with sublinear memory cost,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1604.06174, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.06174
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ozodbek Khaydarov Isomiddin o‘g‘li
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
