Ironic Expression of the World Linguistic Landscape in Uzbek and Russian Languages
Keywords:
Linguistic worldview, Irony, Enantiosemy, Uzbek language, Russian language, Ironic expression, Artistic discourseAbstract
This article explores the expression of irony in the linguistic worldviews of Uzbek and Russian, examining how cultural and conceptual differences shape its use in both languages. Despite the growing interest in irony across linguistic studies, there is limited research specifically comparing its manifestation in Uzbek and Russian artistic discourse. The aim of this study is to analyze the enantiosemy, semantic, pragmatic, and cognitive aspects of irony, focusing on its verbal and situational forms. Using a comparative approach, the research highlights how irony functions as a speech tool in both languages, revealing distinct linguistic and cultural characteristics. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of irony’s role in shaping meaning and communication, offering insights for cross-cultural studies of language and cognition.
References
[1] N. Khatamov and B. Sarimsakov, Adabiyotshunoslik Terminlarining Ruscha-O‘zbekcha Izohli Lug‘ati. Tashkent: O‘qituvchi, 1979, p. 128.
[2] E. Ibragimova, O‘zbek Tilida Ironik Mazmun Iftolash Usullari. Farg‘ona: O‘quv-Uslubiy Qo‘llanma, 2005, p. 59.
[3] Izzat Sulton, Asarlar. Birinchi Tom, Dramaturgiya. Tashkent: G‘ofur G‘ulom Nomidagi Adabiyot va San‘at Nashriyoti, 1971, p. 440.
[4] K. M. Karamatova and H. S. Karamatov, Proverbs / Maqollar / Poslovitsy. Tashkent: Mehnat, 2000, p. 400.
[5] Sh. Safarov, Kognitiv Tilshunoslik. Jizzakh: Sangzor, 2006, p. 92.
[6] N. D. Arutyunova, Yazyk i Mir Cheloveka. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoy Kultury, 1999, p. 911.
[7] S. A. Askoldov, "Kontsept i Slovo," in Russkaya Slovesnost: Ot Teorii Slovesnosti k Strukture Teksta: Antologiya, Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoy Kultury, 1997, p. 320.
[8] O. B. Khabitovich, "Relevance of Gender Terminology in English and Uzbek Languages," American Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 247–257, 2024.
[9] B. Omonov, "Ingliz va O‘zbek Tillaridagi Geologiya Sohasiga Oid Terminlarning Leksik-Semantik Xususiyatlari," Scienceweb Academic Papers Collection, 2022.
[10] B. Omonov, "Linguistic Nature of the Term as One of Its Cognitive Factors," Scienceweb Academic Papers Collection, 2022.
[11] B. Omonov, "Ingliz va O‘zbek Tillarida Geologiya Oid Terminlar O‘zlashishi Kognitiv Jarayon Sifatida," Scienceweb Academic Papers Collection, 2022.
[12] B. Omonov, "Geologiya Terminologiyasining Dolzarbligi," Scienceweb Academic Papers Collection, 2021.
[13] B. Omonov, "Geologiyaga Oid Terminlarning Lingvistik Xususiyatlari," Scienceweb Academic Papers Collection, 2021.
[14] B. Omonov, "O‘zbek va Ingliz Tillaridagi Geologik Terminlar Tizimida Terminologiya Shakllantirishning Morfologik Usuli," Scienceweb Academic Papers Collection, 2021.
[15] M. Rajapova, "Study of Discourse and Specific Characteristics of Allegory," Nauka i Tekhnologiya v Sovremennom Mire, vol. 2, no. 17, pp. 53–55, 2023.
[16] M. Malika, "Effective Ways of Communicative Language Teaching," International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 11, pp. 42–46, 2021.
[17] B. Turdikulova, "Ingliz Tilidagi Geologik Terminlar va Ularni O‘zlashtirish," News of the NUUz, vol. 1, no. 1.5, pp. 326–329, 2024.
[18] O‘zbekistondagi Oliy va O‘rta Maxsus Ta’lim Vazirligi Alisher Navoiy Nomidagi Toshkent Davlat Universiteti, Terminologiyasi, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2024.
[19] L. M. Dos Santos, "The Discussion of Communicative Language Teaching Approach in Language Classrooms," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 104–109, 2020.
[20] G. Hu, "Potential Cultural Resistance to Pedagogical Imports: The Case of Communicative Language Teaching in China," Language, Culture and Curriculum, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 93–105, 2002.
