The Social Characteristics of The Lexical Composition in Internet Media Texts

Authors

  • Mukhlisa Sabirova Doctoral student at the Institute of Uzbek Language, Literature and Folklore of the, Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Philology

Keywords:

Sociolinguistics, Barbarism, Socially Marked Lexical Units

Abstract

Language is not only a medium of communication but a mirror of social identity and interaction, increasingly shaped by digital media. With the rise of Internet communication, colloquial expressions, foreign borrowings (barbarisms), and socially marked lexical units have become widespread in online texts, often at the expense of literary language norms. While the sociolinguistic impact of traditional dialects and jargon is well-documented, the systemic effect of Internet barbarisms on the literary language, especially in Uzbek digital discourse, remains underexplored. This study aims to identify and analyze socially marked lexical elements in Uzbek Internet media texts, assess their influence on literary language, and highlight how their frequent use challenges linguistic standards. Through statistical analysis of barbarism usage on kun.uz and qalampir.uz (2020–2024), it was revealed that foreign words like zapravka, svet, prava, and dayjest appear with notable frequency, despite the existence of Uzbek equivalents. The widespread adoption of such units reflects both the social diversity of users and the erosion of literary norms. The article introduces empirical data quantifying the lexical impact of digital communication on the Uzbek language, emphasizing the sociolinguistic consequences of barbarism proliferation. The findings underscore the urgent need to regulate online language use and reinforce literary standards to safeguard linguistic purity and cultural identity in the digital era.

References

[1] J. Holmes, An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Routledge, 2013.

[2] R. Wardhaugh и J. M. Fuller, An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, 7th изд. Wiley-Blackwell, 2015.

[3] L. P. Krysin, Essays on Sociolinguistics. Moscow, 2021.

[4] F. Filin, Essays on the Theory of Linguistics. Moscow: Nauka, 1982.

[5] A. Author1 и B. Scholar1, Explorations in Sociolinguistic Theory 1. Cambridge: Language Science Press, 2011.

[6] M. Meyerhoff, Introducing Sociolinguistics. Routledge, 2011.

[7] P. Eckert и S. McConnell-Ginet, «Language and Gender: New Directions», Annual Review of Anthropology, сс. 349–369, 2008.

[8] S. Romaine, Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press, 2000.

[9] S. Gal, «Migration, Minorities and Multilingualism: Language Ideologies in Europe», International Journal of the Sociology of Language, сс. 131–152, 2006.

[10] I. A. Boduen de Kurtene, Selected Works on Linguistics. Volume II. Moscow, 1963.

[11] J. Milroy и L. Milroy, Social Network and Linguistic Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.

[12] W. Labov, Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, 1972.

[13] Sh. Usmanova, N. Bekmukhamedova, и G. Iskandarova, Sociolinguistics. Tashkent, 2014.

[14] P. Trudgill, Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. Penguin Books, 2000.

[15] F. Coulmas, Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speakers’ Choices. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

[16] J. A. Fishman, «The Sociology of Language: An Interdisciplinary Social Science Approach to Language in Society», Newbury House, 1972.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-17

How to Cite

Sabirova, M. (2025). The Social Characteristics of The Lexical Composition in Internet Media Texts. Vital Annex: International Journal of Novel Research in Advanced Sciences (2751-756X), 4(4), 124–128. Retrieved from https://journals.innoscie.com/index.php/ijnras/article/view/85

Issue

Section

Articles