Methodological Foundation For Developing Students’ Inventive Abilities
Keywords:
inventive abilities, creative education, methodological principles, Technology subject, TRIZ, project method, problem-based learning, integration, creative thinking, innovative approachAbstract
Modern education increasingly emphasizes the cultivation of students’ creative and inventive abilities as key competencies for participation in an innovation-driven society. Within general education, the subject of “Technology” provides a unique platform by linking theoretical knowledge to practical application, allowing students to engage in design, problem-solving, and creative production. However, conventional instructional approaches often fail to adequately foster inventive thinking. While creativity-oriented pedagogy has been widely discussed, there is limited systematic analysis of methodological principles that specifically enhance students’ inventive abilities in the context of Technology education. This study aims to substantiate the methodological foundations for developing inventive abilities, identify effective pedagogical principles, and propose practical strategies for their implementation in schools. The research highlights seven key principles — openness and freedom, individualization and differentiation, variability, novelty and originality, problem-based learning, integration, and collaboration — as effective in stimulating inventive thinking. It also confirms the pedagogical value of creative instructional methods such as TRIZ, project-based learning, and problem-based approaches in shaping students’ innovative capacity. The study proposes a methodological model for organizing the Technology classroom that integrates creativity-based principles with student-centered strategies, ensuring that theoretical learning is transformed into practical, inventive outcomes. By systematically applying these principles, educators can create environments that foster independence, innovation-seeking, and readiness for inventive activity, thereby preparing students not only for academic success but also for the demands of the 21st century.
References
J. W. Thomas, «A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning», Autodesk Foundation, San Rafael, CA, 2000. https://www.asec.purdue.edu/lct/HBCU/documents/AReviewofResearchofProject-BasedLearning.pdf
G. Altshuller, And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center, 1994.
B. A. Hennessey и T. M. Amabile, «Creativity», Annu. Rev. Psychol., т. 61, сс. 569–598, 2010, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416.
M. Csikszentmihalyi, Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins, 1996. https://worldcat.org/title/32856620
R. K. Sawyer, Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation, 2-е изд. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/explaining-creativity-9780199737574
P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, и A. Palincsar, «Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning», Educ. Psychol., т. 26, вып. 3–4, сс. 369–398, 1991, doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139.
C. E. Hmelo-Silver, «Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?», Educ. Psychol. Rev., т. 16, вып. 3, сс. 235–266, 2004, doi: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
S. Bell, «Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future», Clear. House J. Educ. Strateg. Issues Ideas, т. 83, вып. 2, сс. 39–43, 2010, doi: 10.1080/00098650903505415.
R. J. Sternberg и T. I. Lubart, «The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms», в Handbook of Creativity, R. J. Sternberg, Ред., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, сс. 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.003
M. A. Boden, The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, 2-е изд. London: Routledge, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203508527
G. Altshuller, The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center, 1999.
J. P. Guilford, The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967. https://worldcat.org/title/1339858
M. A. Runco и G. J. Jaeger, «The Standard Definition of Creativity», Creat. Res. J., т. 24, вып. 1, сс. 92–96, 2012, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.
E. P. Torrance, Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-Technical Manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, 1974. https://www.ststesting.com/ttct.html
J. A. Plucker, R. A. Beghetto, и G. T. Dow, «Why Isn’t Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity Research», Rev. Educ. Res., т. 74, вып. 1, сс. 59–109, 2004, doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yangiboyeva Qunduzoy Shuxratovna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.