The Dialectics of Acme Personality and Education in Contemporary Society

Authors

  • Mirzaev Sobirjon Aminovich Scientific researcher of Samarkand State Pedagogical Institute

Keywords:

Acme Personality, Acmeology, Dialectics, Educational Philosophy, Self-Realization, Personal Development, Human Potential, Digital Education, Existential Growth, Pedagogical Transformation

Abstract

The problem of acme personality formation has become increasingly significant in contemporary educational philosophy and human development studies. Modern societies require individuals who are capable of self-realization, creative thinking, ethical responsibility, and continuous self-improvement. Within this context, the dialectical relationship between education and acme personality formation emerges as a crucial philosophical and pedagogical issue. This article analyzes the conceptual foundations of acme personality, examines the dialectical interaction between individual self-development and educational systems, and explores contemporary transformations of acme-oriented education in the digital age. The findings demonstrate that education functions not only as a mechanism of knowledge transmission but also as a dynamic process of personality actualization and existential growth. The article concludes that the dialectics of education and acme personality development remain central to the formation of intellectually mature and socially responsible individuals in the twenty-first century.

References

[1] A. Derkach, Acmeology: Personal and Professional Development. Moscow, Russia: RAGS Press, 2018.

[2] A. Bodalev, Psychology of Personality and Acmeology. Saint Petersburg, Russia: Piter, 2019.

[3] A. Maslow, Motivation and Personality. New York, NY, USA: Harper & Row, 1987.

[4] C. Rogers, On Becoming a Person. Boston, MA, USA: Houghton Mifflin, 1961.

[5] J. Dewey, Democracy and Education. New York, NY, USA: Macmillan, 1916.

[6] L. Vygotsky, Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

[7] P. Freire, Pedagogy of Freedom. Lanham, MD, USA: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.

[8] D. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, 1983.

[9] N. Noddings, Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press, 2013.

[10] P. Jarvis, Lifelong Learning and the Learning Society. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2012.

[11] G. Siemens, “Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age,” International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 45–59, 2020.

[12] B.-C. Han, The Burnout Society. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press, 2015.

[13] G. Biesta, Good Education in an Age of Measurement. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2016.

[14] H. Giroux, Neoliberalism’s War on Higher Education. Chicago, IL, USA: Haymarket Books, 2014.

[15] M. Peters, “Digital pedagogy and human development,” Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 96–114, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Aminovich, M. S. (2026). The Dialectics of Acme Personality and Education in Contemporary Society. Web of Scholars : Multidimensional Research Journal, 5(3), 246–250. Retrieved from https://journals.innoscie.com/index.php/wos/article/view/309

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.