Factors of Sovereignty of the Psychological Space of the Personality in the Study Groups of the Military Academic Lyceum
Keywords:
Collective subject, Sovereignty of the psychological space of the individual, S-closed study groupAbstract
This study addresses the subjectivity of semi-closed study groups, focusing on the psychological privacy of individuals within such groups as a key indicator of their subjective qualities. While prior research has explored group dynamics and individual psychological sovereignty, the interplay between personal and group socio-psychological characteristics in semi-closed environments remains underexplored. The research aims to examine the extent to which these characteristics contribute to the sovereignty of psychological space in cadets of a military lyceum. Using a regression model, the study analyzed the influence of socio-psychological traits, integrating both individual and collective dimensions. Results highlight the significant role of group cohesion and individual autonomy in shaping psychological sovereignty, offering insights into optimizing group environments for enhanced psychological well-being. These findings have implications for the development of strategies to support individual privacy while fostering collective functionality in semi-closed educational settings.
References
[1] A. M. Borovik, Specificity of Social and Psychological Adaptability of Pupils to the Conditions of a Cadet Boarding School: Author's Abstract. Diss. Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Moscow, 2015, 28 p.
[2] K. M. Gaidar, "Group Subject in the Mirror of Social Perception," Bulletin of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, vol. 4, no. 48, pp. 108–111, 2010.
[3] K. M. Gaidar, Social and Psychological Concept of a Group Subject, Voronezh: Publishing House of Voronezh University, 2013, 396 p.
[4] L. M. Dodova and L. Yu. Konstantinidi, "The Role of the Educational Environment in the Personal and Psychological Development of Pupils of the Cadet Corps," Eurasian Union of Scientists, no. 6-6 (15), pp. 54–56, 2015.
[5] A. Gordienko, "The Acephalic Community: Bataillean Sovereignty, the Question of Relation, and the Passage to the Subject," Continental Philosophy Review, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 75–90, 2019.
[6] J. M. Domingues, Sociological Theory and Collective Subjectivity, London: Macmillan Press, 1995.
[7] K. M. Kirby, Indifferent Boundaries: Spatial Concepts of Human Subjectivity, New York: Guilford Press, 1996.
[8] G. Duncan, "Sovereignty and Subjectivity," Subjectivity, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 406–423, 2013.
[9] A. Abizadeh, "Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity," American Political Science Review, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2005.
[10] J. P. Burgess, "The Real at the Origin of Sovereignty," Political Psychology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 653–668, 2017.
[11] N. Rose, Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[12] M. Verkuyten and B. Martinovic, "Collective Psychological Ownership and Intergroup Relations," Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1021–1039, 2017.
[13] K. Woodward, J. P. Jones III, and S. A. Marston, "The Politics of Autonomous Space," Progress in Human Geography, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 204–224, 2012.
[14] C. L. Zeiher, "The Conjecture of Sovereignty: New Anxieties for the Subject," Journal of Extreme Anthropology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 92–110, 2018.
[15] Y. Wu, Affect, Violence, and Sovereignty: Reading Collective Isolation in Post-Catastrophic Trauma Writings, Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University, 2024.
[16] V. Grebennikova et al., "Spiritual and Moral Sovereignty of Personality in Information Society: A Subjective Environmental Approach," Synesis, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 100–112, 2023.
[17] W. Coffey and R. Tsosie, "Rethinking the Tribal Sovereignty Doctrine: Cultural Sovereignty and the Collective Future of Indian Nations," Stanford Law & Policy Review, vol. 12, pp. 191, 2001.
[18] D. W. Riggs and M. Augoustinos, "The Psychic Life of Colonial Power: Racialised Subjectivities, Bodies and Methods," Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 461–477, 2005.
[19] J. Cocks, On Sovereignty and Other Political Delusions, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.
[20] D. Stojanovic, "Space, Territory and Sovereignty: Critical Analysis of Concepts," Nagoya University Journal of Law and Politics, vol. 275, pp. 111–185, 2017.
