Digitalization of the Processes for Commissioning and Acceptance of Completed Construction Projects

Authors

  • F.M. Sultonov Senior Prosecutor of the Department for Oversight of the Implementation of Legislation in the Construction Sector

Keywords:

Digitalization, Construction Sector, Commissioning Process, Transparency, Corruption Prevention, E-Government, Construction Management

Abstract

Digital transformation in the construction sector plays a crucial role in improving transparency, efficiency, and accountability in public administration. This study examines the digitalization of the processes for commissioning and accepting completed construction projects in Uzbekistan. The research analyzes existing administrative procedures, identifies bureaucratic challenges, and evaluates the risks associated with insufficient digitalization of these processes. The findings indicate that the lack of a unified electronic system for commissioning facilities leads to delays, administrative inefficiencies, and increased risks of corruption. Based on international experiences and national practices, the study proposes the introduction of an integrated digital platform connected with the “Transparent Construction” information system to improve monitoring, reduce bureaucratic procedures, and ensure timely commissioning of construction facilities.

References

[1] World Bank, Digital Transformation in Construction Sector, Washington, DC, USA, 2020.

[2] OECD, Digital Government Review of Public Sector Governance, Paris, France, 2021.

[3] Asian Development Bank, Digital Governance and Transparency in Infrastructure Projects, Manila, Philippines, 2022.

[4] Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Resolution No. 200 “On approval of administrative regulations for issuing permits for completed construction facilities,” Apr. 20, 2022.

[5] United Nations, E-Government Survey 2022: Digital Government in the Decade of Action, New York, NY, USA, 2022.

[6] K. Eastman, C. Eastman, and P. Teicholz, BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2018.

[7] M. Hardin and D. McCool, Construction Management: Principles and Practice, New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2015.

[8] J. Smith, “Digital governance in the construction industry,” Journal of Construction Management, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 221–230, 2021.

[9] A. Johnson, “E-government and public sector transparency,” Public Administration Review, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 565–574, 2019.

[10] B. Flyvbjerg, Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

[11] Transparency International, Preventing Corruption in Infrastructure Projects, Berlin, Germany, 2020.

[12] S. Lee and H. Kim, “Smart construction technologies and digital transformation,” Automation in Construction, vol. 119, 2020.

[13] European Commission, Digital Transformation of Construction Industry, Brussels, Belgium, 2021.

[14] J. Oesterreich and F. Teuteberg, “Understanding the implications of digital transformation in construction,” Computers in Industry, vol. 121, 2020.

[15] M. Bolpagni, “The implementation of digital construction platforms,” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 27, no. 6, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-14

How to Cite

Sultonov, F. (2026). Digitalization of the Processes for Commissioning and Acceptance of Completed Construction Projects. Vital Annex: International Journal of Novel Research in Advanced Sciences (2751-756X), 5(2), 26–30. Retrieved from https://journals.innoscie.com/index.php/ijnras/article/view/160

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.